Collapse Of The Vaults Beauvais Cathedral - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Collapse Of The Vaults Beauvais Cathedral? Answer: Introducation Engineering failures are able to happen at different situations. In many cases, engineering failures have been able to happen since in past decades. Nevertheless, mitigation measures are usually required to be taken before the execution of the projects. Measures are usually taken in advance to ensure that the failures are prevented. Nevertheless, these measures are at times not able to withstand the failures and therefore not able to prevent such failures. Moreover, the engineering failures are able to happen on different situations and different ranges (Drysdale, 2011). Ranges on these failures are wide and are able to enhance the different aspects of the projects. The control of the engineering projects is critical to ensure safety of the structure. Engineers are able to enhance the safety of the structures by enhancing and considering different aspects of the projects. Medium and widespread engineering failures are common in many of the projects. Under these situations, many of th e projects are able to experience different failures under different situations. Medium level Under construction, buildings are meant to withstand fire situations and enhance their safety measures. Since long time, engineers were able to be designed to prevent the engineering failures under fire situations. Artillery fire was able to happen 10 May 1721 and therefore destroying St. Peter's church in Riga. The church was able to experience the fire, which enhanced the engineering failure. Masonry construction is meant to be able to withstand the fire effects at any instances. The masonry walling and structures are able to enhance the resistance into effects of fire and excessive heats. The structural capacity of the masonry should have the capacity to prevent the engineering failure. Wall thickness is one of the major preventive measure, which is usually in cooperated to enhance the failure. Enough coating is a key measure that should ensure that the failure of fire is prevented. The inherent risk from this failure is the collapse of the wall. The wall should be in strong posit ion in order to withstand such exposures and ensure that the wall does not fail. The fire is able to weaken the bonding materials and therefore causing the wall failure. Design flaws are key in ensuring that a proper mitigation program is achieved. The level of damage on this project was at medium level. The damage is able to define different levels and measures, which can be used to rectify the damage. At this project, reconstruction measures were taken to rectify the damage on this level (P?tersone, 2010). The damage was able to lead to complete reconstruction of the wall areas. This is because the bonding structure was weakened and this led to increase the damages. Masonry structures only withstand heat up to some levels and this plays a critical extend under which the damage was experienced on this structure. The fire effect was able to destroy the interior section of the church. The partition sections and walls were completed and led to the complete replacement of the interior section, which was termed as a medium damage level on the project (Drysdale, 2011). Fault on electrical sections are the major key causes of the fire, which was able to lead to the engineering failure. The low strength of the wall qualifies to be eng ineering failure because they are able to affect the strength of the members of structure. Limestone covering was also done during the reconstruction stage. This was a measure to be able to enhance the prevention of damage to the fire level. This is a preventive measure, which should be in cooperated earlier and would have enhanced the construction of the project. This pre-failure mitigation strategy would have worked to ensure that the damage and failure is prevented. Materials failure can also be highly attributed to the engineering failure on this project. The inability of the material to withstand such heat and therefore failing. Widespread Engineering failure is able to extend to a level, which the damage is higher and able to extend to other structures and properties within. Another key failure, which has been able to happen in the engineering sector, is the collapse of the Beauvais Cathedral church, which happened on 1284. The building was able while under construction and the fault was laud mostly on the engineers and masons who were on the site (Karl and Barnett, 2010). The failure was able to happen on the completed choir, where French masons were working on the Gothic style. In addition, the failure on this structure was also attributed to the foundation failures and wring spacing of the piers. On this note, it was noted that the designers had a large part to play on this engineering failure. The materials failures were attributed to the increased loading on the present piers and therefore led to the failure of the members (Maury and Robert, 1976). The analysis model for the loading, which the designers were able to apply, is thought to have played a key role in the resulting to the failure. The two-dimensional epoxy mode was applied and thought to have generated the loadings, which were not accurate. Proper design measures are the key methods, which could have been coupled to ensure that the failure is minimized. Moreover, additional or over designs are key areas, which are mostly key in many structures to ensure that the collapse is prevented. Additionally, the foundation was found to be more weak and unable to carry the masonry at the east and west terminations. This was able to lead to the collapse of the piers and causing large damage. Geotechnical engineering of the soil and foundation are key measures, which need to be carried before the commencing of any major superstructure works. This is a preconstruction measure, which could having played a key role to ensure that the failure did not occur. The geotechnical details would have given the key foundation construction measures, which could have enhanced the foundations to carry additional weight (Cruickshank, 1996). These extreme conditions at this project together coupled and increased the impact of the plane and therefore increasing the damage and causing the failure. Internal buttress were experienced on different locations and therefore increasing the need to more repair and damages, which needed to be amended. References CRUICKSHANK, D., ED. (1996). Sir Banister Fletcher's A History of Architecture (20th ed.). Architectural Press. p. 436. DRYSDALE, D., (2011). An Introduction to Fire Dynamics New York: Wiley Interscience, pp. 134140. KARL, B. P. AND BARNETT, H. M. (September 2010). "Completing Beauvais Cathedral" (PDF). Architectural Association School of Architecture. MAURY I. W. AND ROBERT M. (Jul., 1976). "The Collapse of the Vaults of Beauvais Cathedral in 1284," Speculum 51, no.3: 462-476. https://doi.org/10.2307/2851708 P?TERSONE, Z. (April 2010). "Chapter IX. Architecture, landscaping and engineering" (PDF). netherlandsembassy.lv. p.8. Retrieved 8.